The system protects workers; it does not score them.
Nonprofit pay is not a side issue. It is directly tied to service capacity, turnover, reliability, and whether fundraising is truly covering the mission promise.
Show the human cost of underfunded work.
Use this to make the staff protection case visible without ranking individual employees or turning morale into surveillance.
Waiting for inputs.
The output is an organization-level capacity read, not an employee-performance read.
What can and cannot be asked.
Feedback can support the work system. It should not become hidden performance scoring, biometric/emotion inference, or a way to punish staff for resource constraints.
Team-level work conditions.
Coverage gaps, handoffs, safety, training, scheduling friction, support needs, and manager follow-through.
Individual dignity and privacy.
No employee ranking, no hidden discipline pipeline, no inference from emotion, and no survey output without purpose limits.
Funding response.
If staff feedback shows pay or coverage pressure, development and finance need a funded response path.